<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CORRECTED: PSERS Might Lower Assumed Rate Of Return For Pension Investments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paindependent.com/2010/12/corrected-psers-might-lower-assumed-rate-of-return-for-pension-investments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paindependent.com/2010/12/corrected-psers-might-lower-assumed-rate-of-return-for-pension-investments/</link>
	<description>Pennsylvania political news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:15:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PA public pensions&#8217; future may mean even higher taxpayer costs&#160;&#124;&#160;Statehousenewsonline.com</title>
		<link>http://paindependent.com/2010/12/corrected-psers-might-lower-assumed-rate-of-return-for-pension-investments/#comment-801</link>
		<dc:creator>PA public pensions&#8217; future may mean even higher taxpayer costs&#160;&#124;&#160;Statehousenewsonline.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paindependent.com/?p=895#comment-801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] but give a more accurate picture of the costs facing the pension systems, experts say.  Last year, when the PSERS’ board voted to reduce its assumed rate of return from 8 percent to 7.5 percent, it added more than $4 billion to the fund’s unfunded liability immediately, according to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] but give a more accurate picture of the costs facing the pension systems, experts say.  Last year, when the PSERS’ board voted to reduce its assumed rate of return from 8 percent to 7.5 percent, it added more than $4 billion to the fund’s unfunded liability immediately, according to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
