News

WashedOut

April 19, 2011 | By PA Independent | Posted in General News

Water main line breaks in capital raise water integrity concerns across state

Geist: 'This happens in every old city in Pennsylvania'

By Darwyyn Deyo | PA Independent

HARRISBURG – A water-main break at the state Capitol is just a trickle compared to the tsunami that could wash across the state if Pennsylvania's infrastructure needs are not addressed.
 
“It’s deferred maintenance,” state Rep. Rick Geist, R-Blair. “We’ve been doing it now for many, many years and sometimes the General Assembly and the governor, especially the governor, has to wake up to the fact that this stuff needs to be fixed.”
 
A report from the American Society of Civil Engineers, released in January, said that during the next 20 years Pennsylvania needs to spend $7.18 billion on wastewater infrastructure and another $10.99 billion to upgrade its drinking water infrastructure.

“You need a lot of money pumped into these systems to make them work,” said Geist. “The only time people say anything is when they don’t have water and their sewage doesn’t work.”

The water-main break at the Capitol on Monday led to non-essential state workers being sent home with pay, and the water holiday continued on Tuesday.
 
A spokesman for the Water Supply and Wastewater Infrastructure Program, known as PennWorks, was unavailable for comment Tuesday because of the governor's order to send home all non-essential personnel. PennWorks is a branch of the state Department of Community and Economic Development that provides grants to municipalities for water infrastructure work.

Geist, who chairs the House Transportation Committee, said public safety is the No. 1 job of government.

 “If you don’t have a water system that works, you’re looking at diseases and all kinds of problems, Geist said. "If you have a sewer system that doesn’t work, you’re guaranteed that.”

He said Harrisburg's water-main break is unlikely to spur the state to action, though similar system failures “happen all over the state.”

Geist has proposed legislation to address the state's bridges, roads and highway needs, and would like to revive a proposal from the previous session by state Rep. Mike Turzai, R-Allegheny, that addresses water and sewer infrastructure. The work, Geist said, could be funded by private-public partnerships, known as P3s.

Turzai's office did not return telephone calls seeking comment.

Nathan Benefield, director of research for the Commonwealth Foundation, said P3s would be a good way to address infrastructure needs, though he said the cost should fall to local governments instead of state government.

“This is an area that it is easy to make residents and business pay directly through user fees, rather than using general tax revenue — making it ripe for use of P3s —  but also to ensure than any funds for infrastructure upgrades be passed on to users and in protected funds,” said Benefield.

But Douglas Hill, executive director of the County Commissioners Association of Pennsylvania, said the state’s water infrastructure could not easily be moved to the county level.

“Water systems are a mix of public and private,” said Hill. “The majority is private water systems.”
 
State Rep. Bud George, D-Clearfield, minority chair of the House Environmental Resources and Energy Committee, said nobody wants to be the one to raise taxes or fees to address water-related infrastructure needs. And, he said, costs will be high in terms of “lost economic opportunities, taxpayer dollars and environmental damage.”

“I think we suffer from a collective blind spot when it comes to paying for infrastructure,” George said. “We just don’t want to confront that it costs money, often a lot of money, just to maintain infrastructure. We all know it’s going to cost money, and the longer we wait the more it’ll cost. But nobody wants to be the one blamed for raising this tax or that levy.”

Geist agreed, adding that infrastructure “does not have a high political priority of any kind.”

“There are those who believe that we should have infrastructure just like a Third World country,” Geist said. “A lot of them really consider themselves to be very good government people, but when you talk and act this way, you’re only putting the bill off to somebody later in life, because at some point people are going to demand these services.”
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Ping.fm
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • RSS
  • Print